Use of Micro-focused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening of Mid and Lower Face.
초록 펼치기
Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance. The aging of facial structures depends on genetic, anatomic, chronologic, and environmental factors that affect the skin and underlying tissues. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for skin laxity. As the nutritional status may contribute to skin aging, it would be interesting to evaluate whether different dietary patterns can also influence the response to MFU-V treatment for skin laxity. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of MFU-V therapy between omnivore and vegan patients. Twenty-seven vegan and twenty-seven omnivorous women who underwent MFU-V treatment for laxity of lower face and neck were enrolled. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the FLR (Facial Laxity Rating) scale after 3 and 6 months from treatment. At baseline, no significant differences were found in terms of FLR scale in both treated sites. After 3 months, reduction in FLR scale was significantly lower for vegans both on face (P = .04) and neck (P = .004). At 6 months, vegan patients had a worse clinical outcome on lower face (P = .001) and neck (P < .001). The present study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of a MFU-V treatment. The changes in the mid face and lower face are among the most prominent features of the aging process. Intense focused ultrasound, known as the Ulthera System (Ulthera Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA), was designed to correct this process. It employs micro-focused ultrasound to cause discrete focal heating of the dermis and stimulates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This study enrolled 50 adult patients of Indian ethnicity who opted for correction of mid face and lower face sagging by Ulthera. The subjects were treated using Ulthera 3.0 mm probes which targets deep dermis and 4.5 mm, which targets the superficial muscular aponeurotic system. All patients were evaluated for allergic reactions and side effects like scarring and nerve/muscle dysfunction. Investigators Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores and Patients Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores were used for analysis at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Photographs were taken for detailed facial evaluation. Patients were asked to fill a self-assessment questionnaire. At the end of 6 months, improvements in mid face and lower face were reported in 93% patients by blinded reviewers and 85% patients found the results to be satisfactory. The same results were maintained at the end of 1 year. Our study showed that substantial results can be achieved in overall aesthetic improvement of sagging of mid face an