임상 논문

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for weight management and type 2 diabetes, but reports of reduced skin laxity and volume have raised aesthetic concerns. This study evaluates the first integrated skincare protocol designed for GLP-1 RA users. This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, split-face/split-neck study included 25 GLP-1 RA users (mean age 53.36 years) with mild-to-moderate skin aging, including male and female participants with Fitzpatrick skin types II to VI. All participants applied a topical regimen featuring Proxylane and wild fruit flavonoids (Flavo-Proxylane) to one side of the face/neck and a placebo to the other. After 4 weeks of topical monotherapy, participants received a single focused ultrasound treatment, followed by an additional 8 weeks of topical therapy. Outcomes included blinded image evaluation, 13 clinical grading parameters (via modified Griffiths scale), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, tolerability, and patient-reported satisfaction. All participants completed the study and lost an average of 3.7 lb. After 4 weeks of Flavo-Proxylane monotherapy, significant improvements were observed for facial skin laxity (- 16%; P < 0.001) and marionette lines (- 5%; P < 0.05), while no significant changes were observed with placebo. By week 12, the combined regimen achieved amplified improvements versus baseline, week 4, and placebo (all P < 0.001), with total reductions of 44% in skin laxity and 34% in marionette lines. Significant improvements were observed across all 13 clinical parameters. Overall improvement rating favored Flavo-Proxylane, with 94% reporting moderate-to-significant improvement versus 30% for placebo. Flavo-Proxylane treatment was well tolerated, with 84% reporting improved skin appearance and only three mild, self-resolving adverse events. This study demonstrates that an integrated regimen with Flavo-Proxylane products and ultrasound may improve aesthetic outcomes in a diverse range of participants undergoing GLP-1 RA treatment. Skin laxity, driven by collagen/elastin degradation and aging, is targeted by micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) through depth-specific thermal coagulation to induce collagen remodeling, yet parameter-dependent thermal kinetics and safety thresholds remain underexplored, limiting protocol optimization. To validate the dose-effect relationship of MFU using in vitro porcine skin tissues and evaluate its safety and efficacy for human facial skin tightening. Porcine skin tissues containing intact skin, fat, and muscle layers were treated with 8D-DL 3.0, 8D-DL 4.5, Vmax-DL 3.0, and Vmax-DL 4.5 handpieces. Subcutaneous temperatures at depths of 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 6.0 mm were recorded under varying parameters (energy levels and exposure durations). Twenty patients undergoing single-session MFU facial treatment between June and August 2024 were enrolled. Skin tightening outcomes were assessed at 30- and 90-days post-treatment. For 8D-DL 3.0 and Vmax-DL 3.0 handpieces, peak temperatures occurred at 3.0 mm depth across all energy levels and exposure durations. For 8D-DL 4.5 and Vmax-DL 4.5 handpieces, peak temperatures localized at 4.5 mm. Focal depth temperatures increased significantly with higher energy levels and prolonged exposure. At 30- and 90-days post-treatment, upward displacement and volume reduction in bilateral cheek and jawline regions were observed. Mild procedural pain was reported, with no adverse events. MFU-induced thermal peaks align with preset focal depths, demonstrating parameter-dependent thermal accumulation. The procedure safely achieves clinically significant facial skin tightening. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation modality with the ability to target deep brain structures with high spatial precision. Despite its promise, rigorous evaluation of its efficacy is limited by the absence of reliable, fully double-blind sham methodologies. To develop and validate a pair of visually and mechanically indistinguishable acoustic coupling pads that enable true double-blind tFUS neuromodulation studies by providing either efficient ultrasound transmission or robust ultrasound blocking without altering participant or operator experience. Two coupling pads were engineered: a transmitting pad designed to allow <5% pressure amplitude loss relative to free-water propagation, and a non-transmitting pad designed to attenuate ultrasound by ≥40 dB. Both pads used a Dragon Skin 10 NV silicone base and were identical in size, appearance, flexibility, and handling. The non-transmitting pad incorporated an encapsulated air-based blocking layer using an open-cell polyethylene foam insert. Acoustic performance was evaluated in a water tank using a 650 kHz BrainSonix transducer and a calibrated needle hydrophone. Sound speed of the silicone material was measured using pulse-echo techniques. Twenty-three matched transmitting and non-transmitting pad pairs were fabricated and tested. Transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -0.41 ± 0.53 dB, satisfying the design criterion of minimal acoustic loss. Non-transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -48.61 ± 4.33 dB, exceeding the required -40 dB threshold for effective sham conditions. The Dragon Skin 10 NV substrate exhibited a sound speed of 964.72 m/s and produced <2 mm axial focal shift for standard pad thicknesses, with no measurable change in focal width. Both pad types were visually and tactually indistinguishable, could not be differentiated by experienced operators or participants, and maintained mechanical integrity after repeated cleaning. These acoustically engineered coupling pads provide a practical and validated solution for achieving true single- and double-blind conditions in tFUS neuromodulation studies. By preserving identical sensory and procedural experiences while enabling precise control over ultrasound transmission, this approach addresses a critical methodological gap in human ultrasound neuromodulation research.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for weight management and type 2 diabetes, but reports of reduced skin laxity and volume have raised aesthetic concerns. This study evaluates the first integrated skincare protocol designed for GLP-1 RA users. This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, split-face/split-neck study included 25 GLP-1 RA users (mean age 53.36 years) with mild-to-moderate skin aging, including male and female participants with Fitzpatrick skin types II to VI. All participants applied a topical regimen featuring Proxylane and wild fruit flavonoids (Flavo-Proxylane) to one side of the face/neck and a placebo to the other. After 4 weeks of topical monotherapy, participants received a single focused ultrasound treatment, followed by an additional 8 weeks of topical therapy. Outcomes included blinded image evaluation, 13 clinical grading parameters (via modified Griffiths scale), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, tolerability, and patient-reported satisfaction. All participants completed the study and lost an average of 3.7 lb. After 4 weeks of Flavo-Proxylane monotherapy, significant improvements were observed for facial skin laxity (- 16%; P < 0.001) and marionette lines (- 5%; P < 0.05), while no significant changes were observed with placebo. By week 12, the combined regimen achieved amplified improvements versus baseline, week 4, and placebo (all P < 0.001), with total reductions of 44% in skin laxity and 34% in marionette lines. Significant improvements were observed across all 13 clinical parameters. Overall improvement rating favored Flavo-Proxylane, with 94% reporting moderate-to-significant improvement versus 30% for placebo. Flavo-Proxylane treatment was well tolerated, with 84% reporting improved skin appearance and only three mild, self-resolving adverse events. This study demonstrates that an integrated regimen with Flavo-Proxylane products and ultrasound may improve aesthetic outcomes in a diverse range of participants undergoing GLP-1 RA treatment. Skin laxity, driven by collagen/elastin degradation and aging, is targeted by micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) through depth-specific thermal coagulation to induce collagen remodeling, yet parameter-dependent thermal kinetics and safety thresholds remain underexplored, limiting protocol optimization. To validate the dose-effect relationship of MFU using in vitro porcine skin tissues and evaluate its safety and efficacy for human facial skin tightening. Porcine skin tissues containing intact skin, fat, and muscle layers were treated with 8D-DL 3.0, 8D-DL 4.5, Vmax-DL 3.0, and Vmax-DL 4.5 handpieces. Subcutaneous temperatures at depths of 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 6.0 mm were recorded under varying parameters (energy levels and exposure durations). Twenty patients undergoing single-session MFU facial treatment between June and August 2024 were enrolled. Skin tightening outcomes were assessed at 30- and 90-days post-treatment. For 8D-DL 3.0 and Vmax-DL 3.0 handpieces, peak temperatures occurred at 3.0 mm depth across all energy levels and exposure durations. For 8D-DL 4.5 and Vmax-DL 4.5 handpieces, peak temperatures localized at 4.5 mm. Focal depth temperatures increased significantly with higher energy levels and prolonged exposure. At 30- and 90-days post-treatment, upward displacement and volume reduction in bilateral cheek and jawline regions were observed. Mild procedural pain was reported, with no adverse events. MFU-induced thermal peaks align with preset focal depths, demonstrating parameter-dependent thermal accumulation. The procedure safely achieves clinically significant facial skin tightening. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation modality with the ability to target deep brain structures with high spatial precision. Despite its promise, rigorous evaluation of its efficacy is limited by the absence of reliable, fully double-blind sham methodologies. To develop and validate a pair of visually and mechanically indistinguishable acoustic coupling pads that enable true double-blind tFUS neuromodulation studies by providing either efficient ultrasound transmission or robust ultrasound blocking without altering participant or operator experience. Two coupling pads were engineered: a transmitting pad designed to allow <5% pressure amplitude loss relative to free-water propagation, and a non-transmitting pad designed to attenuate ultrasound by ≥40 dB. Both pads used a Dragon Skin 10 NV silicone base and were identical in size, appearance, flexibility, and handling. The non-transmitting pad incorporated an encapsulated air-based blocking layer using an open-cell polyethylene foam insert. Acoustic performance was evaluated in a water tank using a 650 kHz BrainSonix transducer and a calibrated needle hydrophone. Sound speed of the silicone material was measured using pulse-echo techniques. Twenty-three matched transmitting and non-transmitting pad pairs were fabricated and tested. Transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -0.41 ± 0.53 dB, satisfying the design criterion of minimal acoustic loss. Non-transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -48.61 ± 4.33 dB, exceeding the required -40 dB threshold for effective sham conditions. The Dragon Skin 10 NV substrate exhibited a sound speed of 964.72 m/s and produced <2 mm axial focal shift for standard pad thicknesses, with no measurable change in focal width. Both pad types were visually and tactually indistinguishable, could not be differentiated by experienced operators or participants, and maintained mechanical integrity after repeated cleaning. These acoustically engineered coupling pads provide a practical and validated solution for achieving true single- and double-blind conditions in tFUS neuromodulation studies. By preserving identical sensory and procedural experiences while enabling precise control over ultrasound transmission, this approach addresses a critical methodological gap in human ultrasound neuromodulation research.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for weight management and type 2 diabetes, but reports of reduced skin laxity and volume have raised aesthetic concerns. This study evaluates the first integrated skincare protocol designed for GLP-1 RA users. This 12-week, double-blind, randomized, split-face/split-neck study included 25 GLP-1 RA users (mean age 53.36 years) with mild-to-moderate skin aging, including male and female participants with Fitzpatrick skin types II to VI. All participants applied a topical regimen featuring Proxylane and wild fruit flavonoids (Flavo-Proxylane) to one side of the face/neck and a placebo to the other. After 4 weeks of topical monotherapy, participants received a single focused ultrasound treatment, followed by an additional 8 weeks of topical therapy. Outcomes included blinded image evaluation, 13 clinical grading parameters (via modified Griffiths scale), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, tolerability, and patient-reported satisfaction. All participants completed the study and lost an average of 3.7 lb. After 4 weeks of Flavo-Proxylane monotherapy, significant improvements were observed for facial skin laxity (- 16%; P < 0.001) and marionette lines (- 5%; P < 0.05), while no significant changes were observed with placebo. By week 12, the combined regimen achieved amplified improvements versus baseline, week 4, and placebo (all P < 0.001), with total reductions of 44% in skin laxity and 34% in marionette lines. Significant improvements were observed across all 13 clinical parameters. Overall improvement rating favored Flavo-Proxylane, with 94% reporting moderate-to-significant improvement versus 30% for placebo. Flavo-Proxylane treatment was well tolerated, with 84% reporting improved skin appearance and only three mild, self-resolving adverse events. This study demonstrates that an integrated regimen with Flavo-Proxylane products and ultrasound may improve aesthetic outcomes in a diverse range of participants undergoing GLP-1 RA treatment. Skin laxity, driven by collagen/elastin degradation and aging, is targeted by micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) through depth-specific thermal coagulation to induce collagen remodeling, yet parameter-dependent thermal kinetics and safety thresholds remain underexplored, limiting protocol optimization. To validate the dose-effect relationship of MFU using in vitro porcine skin tissues and evaluate its safety and efficacy for human facial skin tightening. Porcine skin tissues containing intact skin, fat, and muscle layers were treated with 8D-DL 3.0, 8D-DL 4.5, Vmax-DL 3.0, and Vmax-DL 4.5 handpieces. Subcutaneous temperatures at depths of 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 6.0 mm were recorded under varying parameters (energy levels and exposure durations). Twenty patients undergoing single-session MFU facial treatment between June and August 2024 were enrolled. Skin tightening outcomes were assessed at 30- and 90-days post-treatment. For 8D-DL 3.0 and Vmax-DL 3.0 handpieces, peak temperatures occurred at 3.0 mm depth across all energy levels and exposure durations. For 8D-DL 4.5 and Vmax-DL 4.5 handpieces, peak temperatures localized at 4.5 mm. Focal depth temperatures increased significantly with higher energy levels and prolonged exposure. At 30- and 90-days post-treatment, upward displacement and volume reduction in bilateral cheek and jawline regions were observed. Mild procedural pain was reported, with no adverse events. MFU-induced thermal peaks align with preset focal depths, demonstrating parameter-dependent thermal accumulation. The procedure safely achieves clinically significant facial skin tightening. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging noninvasive neuromodulation modality with the ability to target deep brain structures with high spatial precision. Despite its promise, rigorous evaluation of its efficacy is limited by the absence of reliable, fully double-blind sham methodologies. To develop and validate a pair of visually and mechanically indistinguishable acoustic coupling pads that enable true double-blind tFUS neuromodulation studies by providing either efficient ultrasound transmission or robust ultrasound blocking without altering participant or operator experience. Two coupling pads were engineered: a transmitting pad designed to allow <5% pressure amplitude loss relative to free-water propagation, and a non-transmitting pad designed to attenuate ultrasound by ≥40 dB. Both pads used a Dragon Skin 10 NV silicone base and were identical in size, appearance, flexibility, and handling. The non-transmitting pad incorporated an encapsulated air-based blocking layer using an open-cell polyethylene foam insert. Acoustic performance was evaluated in a water tank using a 650 kHz BrainSonix transducer and a calibrated needle hydrophone. Sound speed of the silicone material was measured using pulse-echo techniques. Twenty-three matched transmitting and non-transmitting pad pairs were fabricated and tested. Transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -0.41 ± 0.53 dB, satisfying the design criterion of minimal acoustic loss. Non-transmitting pads demonstrated a mean attenuation of -48.61 ± 4.33 dB, exceeding the required -40 dB threshold for effective sham conditions. The Dragon Skin 10 NV substrate exhibited a sound speed of 964.72 m/s and produced <2 mm axial focal shift for standard pad thicknesses, with no measurable change in focal width. Both pad types were visually and tactually indistinguishable, could not be differentiated by experienced operators or participants, and maintained mechanical integrity after repeated cleaning. These acoustically engineered coupling pads provide a practical and validated solution for achieving true single- and double-blind conditions in tFUS neuromodulation studies. By preserving identical sensory and procedural experiences while enabling precise control over ultrasound transmission, this approach addresses a critical methodological gap in human ultrasound neuromodulation research.

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance.

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance.

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance.

Microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization is well established as a safe and effective treatment for noninvasive skin lifting. Ultherapy Prime is an updated treatment with an advanced processor and improved imaging capabilities that uses microfocused ultrasound with real-time visualization technology to stimulate tissue remodeling and tightening to improve skin laxity. As published data on Ultherapy Prime in Asian patients are lacking, we conducted a case series to describe the effectiveness and safety of Ultherapy Prime for noninvasive skin lifting and improvement of skin laxity in Asians. Thirty participants with mild-to-severe sagging on the Merz Aesthetics Scale (MAS) for jawline and neck volume received Ultherapy Prime treatment. Dual-depth treatment with 650 lines or more of microfocused ultrasound was customized to the patients' facial anatomies using the See, Plan, Treat approach and applied to the fibrous and deep dermal layers. Outcomes assessed included the MAS for jawline and neck volume, subject and physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores, and pain scores. Most participants achieved 1 point or greater improvement in neck volume and jawline using the MAS at day 90, regardless of Fitzpatrick phototypes, age, body mass index, or sex. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement was reported for all physicians and patients (100%), with ratings varying from improved to very improved and very much improved. Treatment was well tolerated (mean pain score 4.50). A single Ultherapy Prime treatment is associated with clinical improvements in jawline and neck skin laxity and is well tolerated in Asian patients across demographics. Micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) can be used to achieve lifting of the brow, lifting of lax submental and neck areas, improving lines and wrinkles on the décolleté, through delivery of ultrasound on tiny points at different levels of the skin. This induces a wound repair reaction, which can achieve the tension and pulling effect of deep dermis and fascia. The objective of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes, including pain, erythema, and edema, following treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. A posttreatment questionnaire was used to collect data on pain, erythema, or edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime and Ultherapy Legacy. This study included 231 participants who underwent treatment with Ultherapy Legacy and Ultherapy Prime and 92 participants who underwent Ultherapy Prime as first-time treatment. Participants reported significantly less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, compared to treatment with Ultherapy Legacy, regardless of whether Ultherapy Prime was performed after Ultherapy Legacy or as first-time treatment. Despite some limitations, e.g., a single-center study performing unblinded treatment of participants, in the absence of a crossover design, participants consistently reported less pain, erythema, and edema after treatment with Ultherapy Prime, supporting its efficacy and safety in nonsurgical facial lifting. However, larger studies in more diverse geographical areas are needed to confirm these findings and rule out the impact of cultural differences on pain perception and expression. Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Non-surgical aesthetic treatments (NSATs) have gained significant traction over the past two decades, prized for their minimally invasive nature, cost-effectiveness, and rapid outcomes. Yet complications associated with these procedures remain underreported, inadequately studied, and inconsistently regulated, compromising patient safety. This mixed-methods study synthesised global data from 457 peer-reviewed studies, 37,250 media articles, 2.28 million social media posts, and regulatory databases, encompassing 231,475 documented complications. Statistical methodologies, including Cox proportional hazards models, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, and geospatial mapping, were employed to evaluate risk trends. Machine learning algorithms forecasted emerging risks, while sensitivity analyses addressed potential data biases. Dermal fillers accounted for 42% of complications, chiefly granulomas, vascular occlusions, and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Botulinum toxin A contributed 15% of cases, predominantly mild adverse effects such as headache, ptosis, and bruising. Thread lift procedures were marred by frequent extrusion and infection rates. The safest products were identified as Prabotulinumtoxin A, Juvéderm high-viscosity fillers, Profhilo, APTOS Light Lift, microneedling radiofrequency devices, Ultherapy, and EMFACE, each demonstrating > 85% safety probability. Predictive models highlighted escalating risks linked to unregulated therapies (e.g. exosomes), while geospatial analysis revealed stark regional disparities, with Asia reporting 34% of complications-attributed to medical tourism and variable oversight. While advancements like standardised complication registries and ultrasound-guided techniques herald progress, transformative measures are imperative. These include mandating adverse event reporting, harmonising global regulatory frameworks, and integrating AI-driven surveillance systems. The field must prioritise transparency, rigorous credentialling, and patient-centred ethics to ensure its evolution aligns with uncompromising safety standards. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . A global survey conducted by The International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) in 2022 reported 18.8 million non-surgical cosmetic procedures, with women representing 87%. Recent literature has shined a light on the possible implication of female sex hormones on the perception of pain, but the influence of these hormones on pain perception secondary to aesthetic procedures have scarcely been studied. Our study aime

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance. The aging of facial structures depends on genetic, anatomic, chronologic, and environmental factors that affect the skin and underlying tissues. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for skin laxity. As the nutritional status may contribute to skin aging, it would be interesting to evaluate whether different dietary patterns can also influence the response to MFU-V treatment for skin laxity. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of MFU-V therapy between omnivore and vegan patients. Twenty-seven vegan and twenty-seven omnivorous women who underwent MFU-V treatment for laxity of lower face and neck were enrolled. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the FLR (Facial Laxity Rating) scale after 3 and 6 months from treatment. At baseline, no significant differences were found in terms of FLR scale in both treated sites. After 3 months, reduction in FLR scale was significantly lower for vegans both on face (P = .04) and neck (P = .004). At 6 months, vegan patients had a worse clinical outcome on lower face (P = .001) and neck (P < .001). The present study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of a MFU-V treatment. The changes in the mid face and lower face are among the most prominent features of the aging process. Intense focused ultrasound, known as the Ulthera System (Ulthera Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA), was designed to correct this process. It employs micro-focused ultrasound to cause discrete focal heating of the dermis and stimulates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This study enrolled 50 adult patients of Indian ethnicity who opted for correction of mid face and lower face sagging by Ulthera. The subjects were treated using Ulthera 3.0 mm probes which targets deep dermis and 4.5 mm, which targets the superficial muscular aponeurotic system. All patients were evaluated for allergic reactions and side effects like scarring and nerve/muscle dysfunction. Investigators Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores and Patients Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores were used for analysis at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Photographs were taken for detailed facial evaluation. Patients were asked to fill a self-assessment questionnaire. At the end of 6 months, improvements in mid face and lower face were reported in 93% patients by blinded reviewers and 85% patients found the results to be satisfactory. The same results were maintained at the end of 1 year. Our study showed that substantial results can be achieved in overall aesthetic improvement of sagging of mid face an

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance.

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance. The aging of facial structures depends on genetic, anatomic, chronologic, and environmental factors that affect the skin and underlying tissues. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for skin laxity. As the nutritional status may contribute to skin aging, it would be interesting to evaluate whether different dietary patterns can also influence the response to MFU-V treatment for skin laxity. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of MFU-V therapy between omnivore and vegan patients. Twenty-seven vegan and twenty-seven omnivorous women who underwent MFU-V treatment for laxity of lower face and neck were enrolled. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the FLR (Facial Laxity Rating) scale after 3 and 6 months from treatment. At baseline, no significant differences were found in terms of FLR scale in both treated sites. After 3 months, reduction in FLR scale was significantly lower for vegans both on face (P = .04) and neck (P = .004). At 6 months, vegan patients had a worse clinical outcome on lower face (P = .001) and neck (P < .001). The present study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of a MFU-V treatment. The changes in the mid face and lower face are among the most prominent features of the aging process. Intense focused ultrasound, known as the Ulthera System (Ulthera Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA), was designed to correct this process. It employs micro-focused ultrasound to cause discrete focal heating of the dermis and stimulates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This study enrolled 50 adult patients of Indian ethnicity who opted for correction of mid face and lower face sagging by Ulthera. The subjects were treated using Ulthera 3.0 mm probes which targets deep dermis and 4.5 mm, which targets the superficial muscular aponeurotic system. All patients were evaluated for allergic reactions and side effects like scarring and nerve/muscle dysfunction. Investigators Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores and Patients Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores were used for analysis at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Photographs were taken for detailed facial evaluation. Patients were asked to fill a self-assessment questionnaire. At the end of 6 months, improvements in mid face and lower face were reported in 93% patients by blinded reviewers and 85% patients found the results to be satisfactory. The same results were maintained at the end of 1 year. Our study showed that substantial results can be achieved in overall aesthetic improvement of sagging of mid face an

Skin quality is a multidimensional concept encompassing four emergent perceptual categories (EPCs): firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization (MFU-V; Ulthera System) is a non-invasive device FDA-cleared for lifting and tightening of the skin in specific areas. Through the generation of thermal coagulation points at defined depths, MFU-V initiates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling, which may support improvements in features related to overall skin quality. To evaluate clinical and preclinical evidence for the impact of MFU-V across the four EPCs of skin quality, including firmness, surface evenness, tone evenness, and glow. A structured narrative review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Of 703 unique records screened, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies evaluated MFU-V, alone or in combination, reporting outcomes mapped to one or more EPCs of skin quality. MFU-V demonstrated consistent improvements in firmness (n = 52 studies), including elasticity and tautness, with sustained effects beyond 6 months. Improvements in surface evenness (n = 35) included wrinkle reduction, pore refinement, and scar remodeling. Effects on tone evenness (n = 4) were observed in melasma and erythema models, with good tolerance in Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI. Glow (n = 4) was indirectly supported by improved texture and structure. Combination protocols involving MFU-V and fillers or neuromodulators reported positive outcomes. Adverse events were rare and transient. MFU-V provides a safe and versatile platform for enhancing multiple aspects of skin quality. Its effects are well supported in firmness and texture, with emerging evidence for tone and glow. The integration of EPC-based outcomes may inform individualized treatment planning and future research. Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal. This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results. This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population. Ultrasound energy is delivered to the dermal and subdermal tissue to induce thermal injury, leading to collagen remodeling and resulting in lifting and tightening of the skin. Ulthera and Sofwave are two Food and Drug Administration-approved systems that have demonstrated clinically significant results in providing eyebrow, submental, and neck lift and minimizing facial fine lines and wrinkles. Patient selection and management of expectations are important components to a successful treatment process. Both devices boast high patient satisfaction rates, minimal recovery time, and excellent safety profile. Ultrasound technology is an effective, nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is a recently developed technology that improves the laxity of the skin due to its capacity of precise focal heating of the dermis and deep layers, consequently inducing neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of MFU-V in improving skin laxity, leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face in women who desired to naturally improve the shape of their faces. Four women between 29 and 36 years were submitted to a specific protocol with 4-MHz - 4.5-mm and 7-MHz - 3.0-mm transducers (Ulthera®) at the buccinators region in one session, and patients were evaluated after 180 days. GAIS (Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale) was assessed through standardized photographs (D0 vs D180). All subjects perceived the slimming of the face after 180 days, as well as the improvement of skin laxity and contour. The practitioner and all the patients were highly satisfied with the results. The assessment of GAIS (D0 vs D180) resulted in score 3 (very improved) for three participants, and score 2 (improved) for one woman. All the patients classified pain experienced during the procedure as mild to moderate. We reported a technique that uses microfocused ultrasound with visualization leading to the slimming of the lower third of the face. Further systematic studies should be performed to understand the mechanism underneath the results and to maximize its performance. The aging of facial structures depends on genetic, anatomic, chronologic, and environmental factors that affect the skin and underlying tissues. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for skin laxity. As the nutritional status may contribute to skin aging, it would be interesting to evaluate whether different dietary patterns can also influence the response to MFU-V treatment for skin laxity. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of MFU-V therapy between omnivore and vegan patients. Twenty-seven vegan and twenty-seven omnivorous women who underwent MFU-V treatment for laxity of lower face and neck were enrolled. The clinical outcome was evaluated using the FLR (Facial Laxity Rating) scale after 3 and 6 months from treatment. At baseline, no significant differences were found in terms of FLR scale in both treated sites. After 3 months, reduction in FLR scale was significantly lower for vegans both on face (P = .04) and neck (P = .004). At 6 months, vegan patients had a worse clinical outcome on lower face (P = .001) and neck (P < .001). The present study suggests that a vegan diet may negatively influence the outcome of a MFU-V treatment. The changes in the mid face and lower face are among the most prominent features of the aging process. Intense focused ultrasound, known as the Ulthera System (Ulthera Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA), was designed to correct this process. It employs micro-focused ultrasound to cause discrete focal heating of the dermis and stimulates neocollagenesis and elastin remodeling. This study enrolled 50 adult patients of Indian ethnicity who opted for correction of mid face and lower face sagging by Ulthera. The subjects were treated using Ulthera 3.0 mm probes which targets deep dermis and 4.5 mm, which targets the superficial muscular aponeurotic system. All patients were evaluated for allergic reactions and side effects like scarring and nerve/muscle dysfunction. Investigators Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores and Patients Global Aesthetic Improvement Scales Scores were used for analysis at 30 days, 60 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Photographs were taken for detailed facial evaluation. Patients were asked to fill a self-assessment questionnaire. At the end of 6 months, improvements in mid face and lower face were reported in 93% patients by blinded reviewers and 85% patients found the results to be satisfactory. The same results were maintained at the end of 1 year. Our study showed that substantial results can be achieved in overall aesthetic improvement of sagging of mid face an