Influence of Different Cordless Light-emitting-diode Units and Battery Levels on Chemical, Mechanical, and Physical Properties of Composite Resin.
초록 펼치기
Dry eye disease (DED), also known as dry eye syndrome, is a multifactorial ocular surface disease. The aim of this review is to present the details of currently approved and upcoming treatment options for DED in a nutshell. We conducted a thorough literature search using PubMed and searched US FDA website, clinicaltrials.gov, and data available in public domain for currently approved and upcoming treatment options for DED. Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medical treatments for treatment of DED include cyclosporine formulations (RESTASIS® [cyclosporine 0.05% ophthalmic emulsion], VEVYE® [cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic solution], and CEQUA™ [cyclosporine 0.09% ophthalmic solution]), XIIDRA® (lifitegrast), a leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1)/intracellular adhesion molecule-1(ICAM-1) inhibitor, EYSUVIS™ (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.25%), a corticosteroid, and MIEBO™ (perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution), a semifluorinated alkane. TYRVAYA™ (varenicline solution nasal spray), a cholinergic agonist, is another formulation approved for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of DED. The medical devices approved for treating DED due to meibomian glands dysfunction (MGD) include Lumenis OptiLight™ (intense pulsed light [IPL] device), TearCare® system, and TearScience™ LipiFlow™ thermal pulsation system. Punctal plugs are another treatment option approved for management of DED. There are hundreds of clinical studies evaluating newer treatments for managing the signs and symptoms. Cyclosporine formulations TJO-087 (cyclosporine A nanoemulsion 0.08%), SCAI-001 eye drops (cyclosporine 0.01%, 0.02%) are being evaluated against RESTASIS® and other approved treatments. The potential treatments being assessed include IC 265, OK-101, PL9643, SYL1001 (tivanisiran), SHJ002, OXERVATE® (cenegermin-bkbj ophthalmic solution 0.002%), HBM9036 (tanfanercept ophthalmic solution), OCS-02 (licaminlimab), MIM-D3 (tavilermide ophthalmic solution 5%), AR-15,512, BRM421, reproxalap, and AZR-MD-001 (selenium sulphide ointment 0.5%). The pathophysiology of DED is complex and multifactorial; there is a need to understand it even deeper. The new treatments and different delivery systems seem promising and provide a hope of effective treatment for DED. The thickness and shade of a restoration will affect the transmission of light from the light-curing unit (LCU). This study determined the power (mW), spectral radiant power (mW/nm), and beam profile of different LCUs through various thicknesses and shades of a CAD-CAM resin composite (BRAVA Block, FGM). Five thicknesses: 0.5; 0.75; 1.0; 1.5, and 2.0 mm, in three shades: Bleach; A2 and A3.5 of a CAD-CAM resin (n = 5). Two single-peak LCUs: EL, Elipar DeepCure-S (3M Oral Care); and OP, Optilight Max (Gnatus), and one multiple-peak LCU: VL, VALO Grand (Ultradent), were used. The LCUs were positioned touching the surface of the BRAVA Block. The power and emission spectrum were measured using a fiberoptic spectrometer attached to an integrating sphere, and the beam profiles using a laser beam profiler. The effect of the material thickness on the light attenuation coefficients was determined. VL and EL delivered more homogeneous beam profiles than OP. The type of the BRAVA Block had a significant effect on the transmitted power, and wavelengths of transmitted light (p < 0.001). There was an exponential reduction in the power and emission spectrum as the thickness of the BRAVA Block increased (p < 0.001). The light transmission through the A2 shade was least affected by the thickness (p < 0.001). The attenuation coefficient was higher for the violet light and higher for A3.5 than the A2 or Bleach shades. No violet light from the VL could be detected at the bottom of 2.0 mm of the BRAVA Block. To analyze the effect of using the resin-based composite manufacturer's recommended exposure time on the degree of conversion (DC), Knoop hardness (KH), and elastic modulus (E) of conventional and bulk-fill resin-based composites (RBCs). Three resin-based composites (RBCs) were tested: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET), Opus Bulk Fill APS (OPU), and RBC Vittra APS (VIT). They were photo-activated in 2 mm deep, 6 mm diameter molds for their recommended exposure times of 10 seconds, 20 seconds, or 40 seconds from four light-curing units (LCUs). Two delivered a single emission peak in the blue light region (Optilight Max and Radii-Cal) and two delivered multiple emission peaks in the violet and blue region (VALO Cordless and Bluephase G2). After 24 hours of dry storage at 37°C in the dark, the KH (Kgf/mm2), E (MPa) and DC (%) at the top and bottom surfaces of specimens (n=5) were measured and the results analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey test (α=0.05). The irradiance (mW/cm2) and spectral irradiance (mW/cm2/nm) from the LCUs were reduced significantly (8-35%) after passing through 2.0 mm of RBC (p<0.001). The DC at the bottom of VIT and TET was less than at the top surface (p<0.001). OPU had the same DC at the top and bottom surface (p=0.341). The KH and E values at the top surface of VIT and TET were substantially higher than at the bottom (p<0.001). OPU exposed for 40 seconds achieved higher mechanical properties than TET that was photo-activated for 10 seconds (p<0.001). The opacity of different bulk-fill RBCs changed differently during the polymerization; OPU became more opaque, whereas TET became more transparent. When exposed for their recommended times, the 2 mm thick RBCs that used Ivocerin or the APS photoinitiator system were adequately photo-activated using either the single or multiple emission peak LCUs (p=0.341). After 24 hours' storage, all the 2 mm thick RBCs photo-cured in 6 mm diameter molds achieved a bottom-to-top hardness ratio of at least 80% when their recommended exposure times were used. TET, when photo-activated for 10 seconds, achieved lower mechanical properties than OPU that had been photo-activated for 40 seconds. The change in opacity of the RBCs was different during photo-activation. Irradiance may decrease as the light-emitting diode (LED) is discharged. Therefore, the LED must be charged carefully to prevent the possibility of influencing the chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of composite resin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different light-emitting diode (LED) curing units and battery levels on the chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of composite resins. The irradiance for each cycle from full to completely discharged battery level was evaluated, for five different new cordless LED units: Optilight Color (Gnatus), Bluephase (Ivoclar), Valo (Ultradent), Radii Plus (SDI), and Radii Xpert (SDI). After the irradiance evaluation, composite resin specimens were prepared and light cured, while varying the battery level for each LED unit: high level (HL, 100%), medium level (ML, 50%), and low level (LL, 10%). The degree of conversion, diametral tensile strength, sorption, and solubility were also evaluated. Data were checked for homoscedasticity and submitted to two-way and three-way analysis of variance, depending on the test performed, followed by the Tukey test with a significance level of 95%. A negative correlation was found between irradiance and cycles of light curing, which was checked by the Pearson correlation test. Valo and Radii Xpert were not influenced by the battery level in any test performed. However, different battery levels for some LED units can influence the degree of conversion, diametral tensile strength, sorption, and solubility of composite resins. With the development of the light-emitting diode (LED) to photo-activate composite resin, greater intensities could be reached without greater elevation of temperature in the mass of the composite resin and in the d